http://traitor666.blogspot.co.uk/

We were governed by people who were mentally ill!
On 28 September 2013, Rod Liddle said this in The Spectator:

   “There is a little vignette in the first volume of Alastair Campbell’s diaries that makes it abundantly clear that, at the time, we were being governed by people who were mentally ill. It is yet another furious, bitter, gut-churning row involving Campbell, Tony Blair and Peter Mandelson and concludes with Mandelson stamping his little feet and screaming: ‘I am sick of being rubbished and undermined! I hate it! And I want out.’

   The cause of this dispute was not whether or not Labour should nationalise the top 200 companies and secure for the workers by hand or by brain the full fruits of their industry. Don’t be silly. It was about whether Blair should wear a suit and tie to deliver a speech or if, instead, he should put on a nice pair of cords…

   It is impossible to read this sort of thing without coming to the conclusion that the most senior elements of New Labour were mad as hatters... seriously damaged, deeply troubled people. If you read on through those diaries, this view is amply confirmed: these awful, awful people who are perpetually wracked with a paranoid fury, drunk or constipated or hunched over the toilet bowl with their fingers down their throats or visited by the Black Dog of depression, or ulcerated or prostate on some sofa to banish the clamorous headaches. And of course continually lying to one another when they weren’t lying to the rest of us, continually stitching each other up, dissolving in a vat of their own bile.

   There have been plenty of diaries emanating from the rule of New Labour (and its hilariously incompetent vestigial tail presided over by the maddest of them all, Gordon Brown) by various unelected and now dispossessed political munchkins, most of them expressing a commercially expedient contrition along with the grotesque outrages, the infractions of democracy, the utter contempt not just for the electorate but also for most of their elected MPs.

   The latest comes from a saturnine pudding-faced thug called Damian McBride… This oaf’s revelations are being serialised in a morning newspaper, all the usual toxic leaks designed to destroy his comrades’ careers, and the usual emetic hands-up-guv-I-shuddna-dunnit faux apology. McBride, who was finally kicked out of his job for inventing filth about various high-profile Conservative politicians is not really apologetic, of course. Far from it; he simply wishes to sell his book…

   McBride is no more sorry than is Alastair Campbell; like Alastair, he just wishes to trouser as much dosh as is humanly possible from his tawdry revelations. I suppose the political correspondents will tell you that the source of that paranoid fury on both sides, Blair and Brown, was the deal or no deal which took place between the two at the Granita restaurant…

   My guess is that long before that dinner each was, as the Americans put it, crazier that a shithouse rat. A megalomaniac on one side, a paranoiac devoid of even the most primitive vestiges of human sociability on the other… And on both sides the loathing, of their own colleagues, of the press, of the electorate.”

Posted by Michael Graham at 08:58 No comments:

The man of the future will be mixed-race!
Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894 –1972), whose father was an Austro-Hungarian diplomat and mother the daughter of a Japanese oil tycoon, was the founder, and President for 49 years, of the Pan-European Union.

In his 1925 book, ‘Praktischer Idealismus,’ he says this:

"The man of the future will be mixed-racel. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear... The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future... will replace the diversity of peoples...

Now we stand at the threshold of the third epoch of the new times: Socialism. Russian Bolshevism constitutes a decisive step towards this purpose where a small group of Communist spiritual aristocrats govern the country and consciously break with the plutocratic democratism which nowadays controls the rest of the world. The general staff of both parties is recruited from Europe's spiritual leader race, the Jews.

From the European quantity-people… the mass, two quality races rise up: blood aristocracy and Jewry… both of them stick to their belief in their higher mission, of their better blood… In both of these heterogenic merited races lies the core of the European nobility of the future… The superiority of their spirit predestines them to become a main factor of the future nobility…

Jewry has bestowed a greater gift on to the disinherited masses of Europe than any other people… Modern Jewry also surpasses all other peoples in percentage of important men… with Trotsky as the frontrunner of modern politics…The prominent position held by Jewry these days is owed to its spiritual supremacy....

Modern anti-Semitism is one of the many reactionary phenomenons of the mediocre against the supreme… As a people Jewry experiences the eternal struggle of quantity against quality, inferior groups against high quality individuals, inferior majorities against superior minorities...

A pacified and socialized Occident will no longer need masters and rulers, only leaders... Europe has been conquered religiously by Jews.”

At war with Japan in WW2, at war with Austria-Hungary in WW1, done over by the Norman aristocracy and their Jewish tax-farmers since 1066, and, in 1925, a Japanese/Austro-Hungarian, mixed-race aristocrat (two of whose three wives were Jewish) wanted to breed we white folks out of existence and install Communism and the Jew as our overlords? Ladies and gentlemen, if this isn’t genocidal New World Order treachery at its most hair-raisingly in your face, I don’t know what is.

Despite which, on 19 September 1946, no lesser personage than Winston Churchill was moved to say this:

"We must build a kind of United States of Europe… Much work has been done upon this task by the exertions of the Pan-European Union WHICH OWES SO MUCH TO COUNT COUDENHOVE-KALERGI…

The structure of the United States of Europe, if well and truly built, will be such as to make the material strength of a single state less important. Small nations will count as much as large ones…

If we are to form the United States of Europe… we must begin now… Our constant aim must be to build and fortify the strength of the United Nations Organisation… We must re-create the European family in a regional structure called… the United States of Europe.

The first step is to form a Council of Europe… France and Germany must take the lead together. Great Britain, the British Commonwealth of Nations, mighty America, and I trust Soviet Russia… must be the friends and sponsors of the new Europe.”

In his memoirs, Coudenhove-Kalergi says:

"At the beginning of 1924, we received a call from Baron Louis de Rothschild; one of his friends, Max Warburg from Hamburg, had read my book (‘Pan-Europa’) and wanted to get to know us. To my great surprise, Warburg spontaneously offered us 60,000 gold marks, to tide the movement over for its first three years ....

Max Warburg… had a principle of financing these movements. He remained sincerely interested in Pan-Europe for his entire life. Max Warburg arranged his 1925 trip to the United States to introduce me to Paul Warburg and financier Bernard Baruch." ('Black Terror, White Soldiers: Islam, Fascism and the New Age,' by David Livingstone)

Wikipedia says this of Bernard Baruch:

"He bought a seat on the New York Stock Exchange for $18,000 ($434,000 in today's dollars). There he amassed a fortune before the age of 30... By 1903 Baruch had his own brokerage firm.... By 1910, he had become one of Wall Street's best-known financiers...

In 1916, Baruch left Wall Street to advise President Woodrow Wilson on national defense and terms of peace. He served on the Advisory Commission to the Council of National Defense and, in 1918, became the chairman of the new War Industries Board. With his leadership, this body successfully managed the US's economic mobilization during WWI.

In 1919, Wilson asked Baruch to serve as a staff member at the Paris Peace Conference... In the 1920s and 30s, Baruch expressed his concern that the United States needed to be prepared for the possibility of another world war... Baruch remained a prominent government adviser during this time and supported Franklin D. Roosevelt's domestic and foreign policy initiatives after his election.

During President Roosevelt's 'New Deal' program, Baruch was a member of the 'Brain Trust' and helped form the National Recovery Administration...

When the United States entered WWII, President Roosevelt appointed Baruch a special adviser to the director of the Office of War Mobilization... During World War II Baruch remained a trusted adviser and confidant of President Roosevelt...

In February 1943, Roosevelt invited Baruch to replace the widely criticized War Production Board head Donald M. Nelson. Baruch had long coveted the job...

In 1946 President Harry S. Truman appointed Baruch as the United States representative to the United Nations Atomic Energy Commission."

Max Warburg (1867 - 1946) was director of the M. M. Warburg & Co. banking house in Hamburg from 1910 until 1938, when he left Germany for America. As head of that firm, he had been an adviser to Kaiser Wilhelm II prior to and during World War I.

In 1914, the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee was established to help Jews who found themselves in straightened circumstances as a result of the war. Max Warburg's brother, Felix, was a leading member of this organisation. In the 12 November 1919 edition of the New York Times, he said this:

"The successive blows of contending armies have all but broken the back of European Jewry and have reduced to tragically unbelievable poverty, starvation and disease about 6,000,000 souls... The Jewish people throughout Eastern Europe… have suffered more from the war than any other element of the population.”

Of course they have, Felix. All those broken-backed six million sufferers had a much, much harder time of it than all the dead lads who actually died in that useless catastrophe. Your six million must definitely have had to endure way more grief and anguish that all the mothers, wives, sweethearts and bewildered little working-class kids pining for their lost loved ones back home. You and your kinfolk are Jewish after all. And, as we all know, the Jew has managed to corner the market in suffering over the course of the last two thousand years.

Oh, and by the way, Felix, that ‘six million’ thing. What is it about that particular number that turns you on? I mean, here you are using it twenty six years before Auschwitz was liberated!

It’s all gone quiet over there.

A partner in the New York investment firm of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., Felix Warburg married the daughter of Jacob Schiff, a senior partner in the firm, in 1895. (Schiff was the principal monetary sponsor of the Russian Revolution)

Paul Warburg, another scion of the German-Jewish banking dynasty, was also a partner in Kuhn, Loeb and co. He arrived in the USA in 1902, having married, Nina, the daughter of Solomon Loeb, in the same year Felix married Frieda (Solomon's granddaughter).

This Warburg was the man most responsible for the creation, in 1913, of the Federal Reserve banking system. After he accepted a position on the board, the May 1915 issue of The Century Magazine quoted him thus:

“The opportunity was offered to show that a Wall Street man could become a valuable public servant and to disprove the prejudice that is rampant in this country that ‘a Wall Street man is a Wall Street man always’ and that you have to be afraid of him… One of the things that tempts me is to show that a Wall Street man does deserve the country's confidence.”

In ‘Warburg, the Revolutionist,' Harold Kellock told us this in the same issue of Century Magazine:

"Paul M. Warburg is probably the mildest-mannered man that ever personally conducted a revolution… He stepped forth armed simply with an idea and he conquered… He imposed his idea on a nation of a hundred million people…

Warburg does not look like an agitator or a revolutionist but he’s played that role for nearly seven years… Single-handed, he set out to bring about a radical constructive change. To accomplish this he had to educate business men and publicists and legislators to his ideas, to transform entirely the point of view of Congress toward financial legislation…

The passage of the Federal Reserve Act… made his revolutionary ideas the law of the land. There is no doubt that without Mr. Warburg there would have been no Federal Reserve Act…

He was a recent immigrant, a Hebrew, a Wall Street man…

It was intimated that Mr. Warburg was the nominee of the ‘money trust,’ that he represented ‘the interests’; there were hints of a Wall Street conspiracy to control the Treasury and the currency system.”

At one point in his essay, Kellock, said:

“Mr. Warburg's income from his private business was at this time (1913) approximately half a million dollars a year.”

$500,000 then would be worth $11,811,969.70 now.

On 17 February 1950, addressing the US Senate, Franklin D. Roosevelt’s top financial adviser, James Warburg, said this:

"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent."

James Warburg was Paul Warburg’s son.

On 10 June 1932, Congressman, Louis T. McFadden said this in the House of Representatives:

“We have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks… The depredations and iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board has cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over.

This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through… the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it.

Some people think the Federal Reserve banks are United States Government institutions. They are not Government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; and rich and predatory money lenders.

In that dark crew of financial pirates there are those who would cut a man's throat to get a dollar out of his pocket; there are those who send money into States to buy votes to control our legislation; and there are those who maintain international propaganda for the purpose of deceiving us and of wheedling us into the granting of new concessions which will permit them to cover up their past misdeeds and set again in motion their gigantic train of crime.

These twelve private credit monopolies were deceitfully and disloyally foisted upon this country by the bankers who came here from Europe and repaid us for our hospitality by undermining our American institutions. Those bankers took money out of this country to finance Japan in a war against Russia. They created a reign of terror in Russia with our money in order to help that war along. They instigated the separate peace between Germany and Russia and thus drove a wedge between the Allies in the World War.

They financed Trotsky's passage from New York to Russia so that he might assist in the destruction of the Russian Empire. They fomented and instigated the Russian revolution and they placed a large fund of American dollars at Trotsky's disposal… so that through him Russian homes might be thoroughly broken up and Russian children flung far and wide from their natural protectors. They have since begun the breaking up of American homes and the dispersal of American children…

When the Federal Reserve act was passed, the people of the United States did not perceive that a world system was being set up here… to supply financial power to an international superstate , a superstate controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure…

The sack of the United States by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks is the greatest crime in history.”

On 27 June 1934, McFadden said this in Washington:

“An increasing number of Jews occupy high key positions in all departments of the United States government… Russian propaganda is freely circulating in the United States… Students of radicalism know that the present Soviet government in Russia was organized by aliens and usurpers and not representatives of the thoughts and ideals of the 150,000,000 citizens of Russia… Note the preponderance of Jews in the Russian government.

The recent overthrow of the German government by the Hitler movement was caused by the preponderance of Jews in the German government, in the universities, as lawyers, as physicians, as bankers… in commerce, in the theatre, moving picture industry, in politics. And now, in the United States government… an increasing number of Jews occupy high key position all departments…

Remember the boring-from-within tactics pursued by these aliens ursurpers who pursued tactics in Soviet Russia which caused the downfall of their government and set up the present Communist-Jewish control government which is now in operation…

The same kind of aliens and usurpers are now at work in the United States to establish a form of government other than the constitutional government.”

The subject of several assassination attempts, McFadden died suddenly of ‘intestinal flu’ after attending a banquet in 1936.

In a 1 October 2000 interview with PBS, Nobel Prize winner, Milton Friedman, whose monetarist philosophy had such a profound influence on Margaret Thatcher, said this:

“Under the Federal Reserve System, you had the worst banking crisis in the history of the United States… It followed policies which led to a decline in the quantity of money by a third. For every $100 in paper money, in deposits, in cash, in currency, in existence in 1929, by the time you got to 1933 there was only about $65, $66 left. And that extraordinary collapse in the banking system, with about a third of the banks failing from beginning to end, with millions of people having their savings essentially washed out, that decline was utterly unnecessary.

At all times, the Federal Reserve had the power and the knowledge to have stopped that… It was, in my opinion, clearly a mistake of policy that led to the Great Depression.”

At an 8 November 2002 conference to honour Friedman, Ben Bernanke, a Federal Reserve governor, said this:

“Before the creation of the Federal Reserve… bank panics were typically handled by banks themselves… However… in the early 1930s the Federal Reserve did not serve that function… Fed officials appeared to subscribe to Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon’s infamous ‘liquidationist’ thesis, that weeding out ‘weak’ banks was a harsh but necessary prerequisite to the recovery of the banking system. Moreover, most of the failing banks were small banks and not members of the Federal Reserve System. Thus the Fed saw no particular need to try to stem the panics.

At the same time, the large banks, which would have intervened before the founding of the Fed, felt that protecting their smaller brethren was no longer their responsibility. Indeed, since the large banks felt confident that the Fed would protect them if necessary, the weeding out of small competitors was a positive good, from their point of view.

Because of institutional changes and misguided doctrines, the banking panics of the Great Contraction were much more severe and widespread than would have normally occurred during a downturn… I would like to say to Milton and Anna: Regarding the Great Depression. You’re right, we did it. We’re very sorry. But thanks to you, we won’t do it again.”

They did it again in 2008. At that time, Bernanke was top man at the Fed.

Friedman was and Bernanke still is Jewish, as is Alan Greenspan, who was the Chairman of the Fed for 19 years in the run up to the 2008 crash.

Greenspan was knighted at the behest of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown in 2002.

On 19 November 2012, the European Council website told us this:

“The President of the European Council Herman Van Rompuy was awarded the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize... to celebrate 90 years of the Pan-Europa movement. The prize is awarded biennially to leading personalities for their extraordinary commitment in the European unification process… The idea, which was also at the centre of Coudenhove-Kalergi's work, has lost nothing of its importance 90 years later…

The prize bears the name of Count Richard Nicolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi... founder of the Pan-European movement (1923). Coudenhove-Kalergi was the pioneer of European integration and propagated the notion of a federation of European states in his works.

The Prize winners since 2000 have included the Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany Angela Merkel (2010) and Vaira Vike-Freiberga, the President of Latvia (2006).”

Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi’s melting pot endeavours and ideology were rewarded when, in 1950, he became the first recipient of the Charlemagne Prize.

Charlemagne was the first Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire.

Think about it.
Posted by Michael Graham at 03:53 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Monday, 23 September 2013

The most unstable and ill-suited figure
In the 21 September 2013 edition of The Independent, Gordon Brown’s former spin doctor, Damian McBride told us what his boss said in 2008, ‘on the evening before he was due to announce the part-nationalisation of UK banks:’

“We’ve just got to get ourselves ready in case it goes wrong tomorrow. And I mean really wrong. Even if there’s a panic in another country, people will see it on the TVs, and they’ll start panicking here. It’s got to be given a chance to work…

If the banks are shutting their doors, and the cashpoints aren’t working, and people go to Tesco and their cards aren’t being accepted, the whole thing will just explode. If you can’t buy food or petrol or medicine for your kids, people will just start breaking the windows and helping themselves. And as soon as people see that on TV, that’s the end, because everyone will think that’s OK now, that’s just what we all have to do. It’ll be anarchy. That’s what could happen tomorrow.

I’m serious, I’m serious . . . We’d have to think: do we have curfews, do we put the Army on the streets, how do we get order back? I’d have to resign, but I couldn’t go if there was just carnage out there: someone would have to be in charge.”

Thus did Gordon, B predict the 2011 riots three years before they occurred.

Army on the streets, eh, Gordon?

Nice.

On 21 September 2013, political biographer, Anthony Seldon, said this in The Daily Mail:

“He was the most unstable and ill-suited figure to have held power in Downing Street since Robert Walpole... He had an interior reality which was quite alien to the world inhabited by most other people…

Many expected Brown’s aggression and undermining of others to cease once he had achieved the highest office. But he could not change the habits of his political lifetime. Rather, they intensified. He saw fresh enemies everywhere… At the heart of the underground operation was McBride... He gave McBride a free rein while washing his hands of any of the dirty details. The regime created an atmosphere of fear... Their tactics were indeed more akin to dictators like Stalin than respected democratic leaders…

The Brown premiership was certainly the most chaotic and unstable in the last century, and possibly in the entire 275 years of British premiership. It… was fatally handicapped, not just by Brown’s inability to earn respect, but also by his squandering of national financial resources, much of it motivated by a desire for popularity.”

Brown is a monster all right. Certifiably insane perhaps. But worse than Blair? Hardly. Tony Blair is the greatest traitor in all British history.

And the British people voted for him three times. Just as they did Thatcher.

‘If you always do what you always did you’ll always get what you always got,’ as they say.

Only worse.
Posted by Michael Graham at 03:55 No comments:

Edward Bernays: the father of U.S. public relations
Austrian immigrant, Edward Bernays, (1891–1995) was the double nephew of Sigmund Freud, his mother was Freud's sister, and his father's sister was Freud's wife.

Wikipedia says this of 'the father of US public relations:'

"Bernays was one of the first to attempt to manipulate public opinion using the subconscious. He felt this manipulation was necessary in society, which he regarded as irrational and dangerous as a result of the 'herd instinct'...

Bernays was named one of the 100 most influential Americans of the 20th century by 'Life' magazine...

Bernays and journalistic giant, Walter Lippman, came to Woodrow Wilson’s aid in 1917 to reverse negative public sentiment about war. These two behind-the-curtain wizards were indispensable in helping the President whip gun-shy America into an anti-German frenzy to go ‘over there’ for WW1. Bernays created the patriotic war slogan ‘make the world safe for democracy,’ an irresistibly patriotic mantra that America embraced."

According to a study by Aaron Delwiche:

"The CPI (Committee on Public Information) blended advertising techniques with a sophisticated understanding of human psychology, and its efforts represent the first time that a modern government disseminated propaganda on such a large scale. It is fascinating that this phenomenon, often linked with totalitarian regimes, emerged in a democratic state… The CPI implemented 'voluntary guidelines' for the news media and helped to pass the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918…

The tools, techniques and processes developed by the CPI to manipulate the collective attitudes of the public did not disappear with the termination of WWI. The heads of the organization went on to apply the lessons learned in time of war to a country at peace. These former CPI agents moved on to Madison Avenue, joined the nascent Public Relations firms and became lobbyists. Two years later the Director of the CPI's Foreign Division argued that 'the history of propaganda in the war would scarcely be worthy of consideration here, but for one fact, it did not stop with the armistice. No indeed! The methods invented and tried out in the war were too valuable for the uses of governments, factions, and special interests'."

Bernays managed to convert the image of fluoride in the public's mind, which at the time was widely sold as a rat poison and insecticide, to that of an absolutely safe-for-children way to a gleaming smile. The prospect of the government mass-medicating water supplies with a well-known rat poison to prevent a non-lethal disease incensed right-thinking people across the country. However, Bernays' guidance saw to it that such sceptics were viewed by the public as right-wing crackpots.

Wikipedia also tells us that:

"Bernay's most extreme political propaganda activities were said to be conducted on behalf of the multinational corporation United Fruit Companyand the U.S. government to facilitate the successful overthrow of the democratically elected president of Guatemala, Jacobo Arbenz Guzman. Bernays' propaganda, branding Arbenz as communist, was published in major U.S. media.

According to a book review by John Stauber and Sheldon Rampton of Larry Tye's biography, The Father of Spin: Edward L. Bernays & The Birth of PR, 'the term 'banana republic' actually originated in reference to United Fruit's domination of corrupt governments in Guatemala and other Central American countries. The company brutally exploited virtual slave labor in order to produce cheap bananas for the lucrative U.S. market'."

The following are quotations taken from Bernays’ seminal work 'Propaganda':

"It was, of course, the astounding success of propaganda during the war that opened the eyes of THE INTELLIGENT FEW in all departments of life to the possibilities of regimenting the public mind… It was only natural, after the war ended, that intelligent persons should ask themselves whether it was not possible to apply a similar technique to the problems of peace."

"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate the organized habits and opinions of the masses constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of the country."

"In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons... We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of… It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world… Vast numbers of human beings must co-operate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society."

"As civilisation has become more complex, and as the need for invisible government has been increasingly demonstrated, the technical means have been invented and developed by which opinion may be regimented. Ours must be a leadership democracy administered by the intelligent minority who know how to regiment and guide the masses".

"The systematic study of mass psychology revealed to students the potentialities of invisible government of society by manipulation… the important thing is that [propaganda] is universal and continuous and in its sum total it is regimenting the public mind every bit as much as an army regiments the bodies of its soldiers… Is it not possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing it?"

"No serious sociologist believes any longer that the voice of the people expresses any divine or especially wise and lofty idea. The voice of the people expresses the mind of the people, and that mind is made up for it by the group leaders in whom it believes and by those persons who understand the manipulation of public opinion."

"The use of propaganda, carefully adjusted to the mentality of the masses, is an essential adjunct of political life."

"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of organised habits and opinions of the masses must be done by experts, the public relations counsels; they are the invisible rulers who control the destinies of millions… the most direct way to reach the herd is through the leaders… All this must be planned… indoctrination must be subtle. It should be worked into the everyday life of the people, 24 hours a day in hundreds of ways… a redefinition of ethics is necessary… The subject matter of propaganda need not necessarily be true."

Nice guy, huh?

When the Austrian-American mind-moulder was writing about 'the intelligent few,' whom do you imagine he was thinking of? I'll give you a clue: Edward Bernays, the Austrian 'father of US public relations,' was Jewish. As was his uncle, Sigmund Freud and the aforementioned Walter Lippmann.

That's who he'd be thinking of, I reckon.

On 31 August 2006, The Daily Telegraph told us this:

“Spending on government spin has trebled under Labour and taxpayers are now supporting an army of more than 3,200 press officers… A total of 1,815 press officers and other public relations staff works in Whitehall departments. John Prescott, the Deputy Prime Minister, has three press officers, despite no longer having a department.

A further 1,444 are employed by a bewildering array of more than 200 quangos and agencies that are paid for out of the public purse, bringing the total number of press officers to 3,259. When Labour came to power in 1997, just over 300 fully-fledged press officers were working in Whitehall...

The Central Office of Information's PR, advertising and marketing budget has soared from £111 million in 1997 to £322 million last year.”

In his 1965 autobiography, Bernays recalled an evening at home in 1933 thus:

"Karl von Weigand, foreign correspondent of the Hearst newspapers, an old hand at interpreting Europe and just returned from Germany, was telling us about Goebbels and his propaganda plans to consolidate Nazi power. Goebbels had shown Weigand his propaganda library, the best Weigand had ever seen. Goebbels, said Weigand, was using my book Crystallizing Public Opinion as a basis for his destructive campaign against the Jews of Germany."

Now that's what I'd call irony.
Posted by Michael Graham at 03:36 No comments:

They know where the homes are!
On 12 September 2013, The Telegraph told us that Education Secretary, Michael Gove, had admitted that, until the Rochdale paedophiles were exposed, his department knew very little about children in care.

Gove added:

“To my astonishment, when I tried to find out more, I met a wall of silence! There was one group of people, however, who did seem to possess all the information: the gangs intent on exploiting these vulnerable children. They knew where the homes were; they knew how to contact the children: at the fish and chip shop, the amusement arcade, in the local park, or just by hanging around outside the houses.

In the name of 'protecting children’ by officially 'protecting’ their information, we had ended up helping the very people we were supposed to be protecting them from. We shielded the children from the authorities who needed to be looking out for them.

One figure stands out: almost half of children are placed in homes outside their local authority areas, and over a third are sent more than 20 miles from home. That is indefensible. So, too, is the fact that more than half of children’s homes are in areas with above-average crime levels.”

The Telegraph continued:

“Children’s homes have failed to provide basic protection while costing taxpayers on average six and a half times as much to care for a single child as it would cost to send them to Eton.

Councils now spend an average of £4,000 a week… to place a child in a home… One council, Bexley in Kent, spent more than £58,000 a week per child, £3million each, on specialist privately run homes last year…

3 out of 10 are located in the worst crime hot spots in the country… They are heavily concentrated in just two areas: the North West and the West Midlands, both of which have been at the centre of grooming scandals…

The Rochdale case, in which nine men, predominantly of Pakistani origin, were last year jailed for grooming and raping a group of girls as young as 13, shone a light on the practice of councils sending vulnerable children to homes hundreds of miles away from friends and family.”

Posted by Michael Graham at 04:00 2 comments:

Mass immigration: an achievement to celebrate!
On 19 January 2013, Barbara Roche, co-founder of Migration Matters and Tony Blair's former Immigration and Asylum Minister, said this in The Independent:

“Labour has a record on immigration it can be proud of… The assumption behind the Immigration Act 1971 was that ‘primary immigration’ should be ended and migration was not a ‘political good’. The opposite is true… Legal migration is, in an age of globalisation, an economic, social and cultural good…

With Jack Straw's blessing, I chose to shift the terms of the debate. I used an address to the IPPR to outline the enormous contribution migrants had made to the UK, to argue the case for managed migration…

There has been a remarkable reversal on this issue by some on the left. The aggressive rhetoric against ‘illiberal’ policies has been replaced by the accusation we let down the white working-class. Suddenly it’s trendy to echo the rhetoric of Migrationwatch, who (say): ‘This has happened as a direct result of Labour’s policy of mass migration’…

Britain’s identity has, in part, been forged by the contribution of generations of migrants. That is an achievement to celebrate.”

No apology for whacking us with what we never wanted there then. As for the ID 'forged by... migrants,' check out the Rogues' Gallery . And then take a peek at Anti-Semitism or Treason?

Roche’s parents were immigrant Jews. Jack Straw, who gave her policies his ‘blessing’ is also Jewish.

Migration Matters was founded by Roche, Lord Navnit Dholakia, an immigrant himself, and the ghastly Tory goofball, Gavin Barwell.
Posted by Michael Graham at 03:51 No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook

Who's war is it anyway?
Pat Buchanan, a senior advisor to Presidents Nixon, Ford and Reagan, sought the Republican presidential nomination in 1992 and 1996 and ran on the Reform Party ticket in 2000 election.

On 6 September 2013, his essay JUST WHOSE WAR IS THIS? appeared at the Human Events web site.

This said:

"John Kerry told the Senate not to worry about the cost of an American war on Syria. The Saudis and Gulf Arabs, cash-fat on the $110-a-barrel oil they sell U.S. consumers, will pick up the tab for the Tomahawk missiles.

Has it come to this? U.S. soldiers, sailors, Marines and airmen as the mercenaries of sheiks, sultans and emirs, Hessians of the New World Order, hired out to do the big-time killing for Saudi and Sunni royals?

Yesterday, too, came a stunning report in the Washington Post. THE CONFERENCE OF PRESIDENTS OF MAJOR AMERICAN JEWISH ORGANIZATIONS HAS JOINED THE ISRAELI LOBBY AIPAC IN AN ALL-OUT PUBLIC CAMPAIGN FOR A U.S. WAR ON SYRIA.

Marvin Hier of the Simon Wiesenthal Center and Abe Foxman of the Anti-Defamation League have invoked the Holocaust, with Hier charging the U.S. and Britain failed to rescue the Jews in 1942. Yet, if memory serves, in ’42 the Brits were battling Rommel in the desert and the Americans were still collecting their dead at Pearl Harbor and dying on Bataan and Corregidor.

THE REPUBLICAN JEWISH COALITION, TOO, bankrolled by Sheldon Adelson, the Macau casino mogul whose solicitude for the suffering children of Syria is the stuff of legend, IS ALSO BACKING OBAMA’S WAR. Adelson, who shelled out $70 million to bring down Barack, wants his pay-off, war on Syria. And he is getting it. Speaker John Boehner and Majority Leader Eric Cantor have saluted and enlisted. Sheldon, fattest of all fat cats, is buying himself a war.

Yet, is it really wise for Jewish organizations to put a Jewish stamp on a campaign to drag America into another war that a majority of their countrymen do not want to fight?... This war has debacle written all over it... Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Martin Dempsey is having trouble even defining the mission. While Obama says it will be an in-and-out strike of hours, a 'shot across the bow,' John McCain says the Senate resolution authorizes robust strikes, lethal aid to the rebels and a campaign to bring down Bashar Assad...

If our power is unleashed, our prestige and superpower status go on the line. If the rebels then lose, we lose. And if the rebels win, who wins? Is it the same jihadists who just shelled that Christian village and terrorized that convent of Christian nuns? Is it the same rebels seen on the front page of Thursday’s New York Times about to execute, Einsatzgruppen-style, captive Syrian soldiers?... Does the Republican Party really want to own a war that could end with al-Qaida in power or occupying sanctuaries in Syria?

Does the U.S. Jewish community really want to be responsible for starting a war that ends with two million Christian Syrians facing a fate not unlike that of Poland’s Jews?

We are told we must punish Assad for killing Syrians with gas, but we do not want Assad’s regime to fall. Which raises a question: How many Syrians must we kill with missiles to teach Assad he cannot kill any more Syrians with gas? Artillery, fine. Just no gas...

The idea of launching missiles based on evidence we will not reveal about Syria’s use of chemical weapons, strikes that will advance the cause of the al-Qaida terrorists who killed 3,000 of us and are anxious to kill more, would be an act of such paralyzing stupidity one cannot believe that even this crowd would consciously commit it.”

Not in my name, Dave!
Iran not Syria is the West's real target
Destroy the governments of seven countries in five years!
Posted by Michael Graham at 01:53 1 comment:

The Madhouse Update
Sunday 29 September

We're more stable, Mr President?
Jewish boss of A.I.G. says banker-bashing is “WAR!" "Like when Hitler invaded Poland!”
Rod Liddle: Under New Labour, it really was the loony left!
Top cop, Mike Barton, calls for an end to war on drugs!
Typical prisoners have numerous brushes with the law before jail
Babies stricken with herpes after Jewish ritual of circumcision
Government of the people is now Government the of terrorists

Saturday 28 September

Bolivian president accuses Obama of instigating conflicts in Middle East
So what did Miliband Snr really believe in? The answer is disturbing
EU demands £6billion from Britain for new bailout
Seymour Hersh on Obama, NSA and the 'pathetic' American media
Nurses in tears as 'horrendous' understaffing hits patients
MI6 planned for Gaddafi to live out his days beyond reach of courts
Did British military train the gunmen who led Nairobi mall massacre?
Brit-loathing expenses cheat, Denis MacShane, to stand trial in May
Fluoride in tap water raises dementia risk?
ELEVEN new cancer drugs vetoed by NICE!

Friday 27 September

Oligarch ex-owner of Portsmouth FC is €500MILLION fraudster who forced bank nationalisation!
'Celebrating diversity' is our new State religion. But don't praise the Lord!
MoD: 'We must make war more acceptable'
Sovieter and Sovieter: EU Strides Confidently Closer to the Abyss
Red Ed and the ghost of socialism and spin
Polish women who move to the UK become more promiscuous
Labour at war!

Thursday 26 September

The man of the future will be mixed-race!
April Jones donations go to African child
Fanatics behind Kenya massacre planned UK reign of terror
Around 100,000 people under 75 die every year from preventable illnesses
Toxic feuding tore both Labour and the country apart
Lib Dems are the party of arrogant leftist hypocrites
Miliband's Marxist father and the real reason he wants to drag us back to the nightmare 70s
KENYA: Half-Jewish oilman Archbishop prays "for those who are doing us harm!"
The 3,700 GPs who earn more than David Cameron
His sins make McBride look saintly: Why is Campbell now treated with such reverence?
Is caffeine in fizzy drinks making teenagers stupid?

Wednesday 25 September

UK's urveillance state goes way beyond anything in George Orwell's 1984!
28% say Britain would be better off with fewer Muslims! Adviser says make them mix!
Majority of voters think immigration is harming Britain!
USA: Rate of new HIV infection in black men 7 times as high as that of white men
UK to give ANOTHER £1billion in foreign aid
Miliband's evasions and untruths would shame a dodgy estate agent
Happy pills linked to a higher risk of diabetes
Doctors spend twice as much time on paperwork than patients
Red Ed's insult to our teenagers' intelligence
Twerking and the pornification of our children
60% of voters say Red Ed’s a loser
'Faith school forced me out for refusing to wear a Muslim veil', says Christian teacher
Thousands 'at risk of losing their eyesight by taking statin pills'
Blood-soaked Blair warns: don't let Assad off the hook!

Tuesday 24 September

DIVERSITY! Slave gang operating at Welsh traveller site - Hunt for buried body
Nkosinati Mabanda had sex with at least 9 women after discovering he had AIDS
Black women make up 90 per cent of all female cases of HIV in Washington
Israeli PM: illegal African immigrants threaten identity of Jewish state
EU representatives call for new pact to stamp out discrimination and promote diversity
"The shocking slaughter in Nairobi is the true face of Islamic fundamentalism"
Back to the future with Marxist Miliband

Monday 23 September

Africans comprise 28% of new HIV/AIDS diagnoses in UK during 2011
African Immigrant gives aids to 40 Young Polish Girls
Britain spent £1.4TRILLION on welfare since 2000! (Immigrants + jobless because of them?)
Pilot, Irfan Faiz, arrested in cockpit of Pakistan-bound aircraft 4 times over legal alcohol limit!
Anjem Choudary's daughter urges Jihad on Twitter
You need Eastern European migrants because Britons are too lazy says Bulgaria government
Muslim "free" school banned pupils from singing and reading fairy tales!
One woman is raped every 4 minutes in St Nelson Mandelaland
More news from the Madhouse here...
Posted by Michael Graham at 03:39 4 comments:

Iran not Syria is the West's real target
On 30 August 2013, Robert Fisk opined thus in The Independent:

“Iran, not Syria, is the West's real target... Iran is Israel’s enemy. Iran is therefore, naturally, America’s enemy…

When Iraq, then America’s ally, used gas against the Kurds of Hallabjah in 1988, we did not assault Baghdad... I also happen to remember that the CIA put it about in 1988 that Iran was responsible for the Hallabjah gassings, a palpable lie that focused on America’s enemy whom Saddam was then fighting on our behalf…

Didn’t Iraq, when it was 'our' ally against Iran, also use gas on the Iranian army? It did. I saw the Ypres-like wounded of this foul attack by Saddam, US officers, I should add, toured the battlefield later and reported back to Washington, and we didn’t care a tinker’s curse about it. Thousands of Iranian soldiers in the 1980-88 war were poisoned to death by this vile weapon…

I think that Bashar al-Assad’s ruthless army might just be winning against the rebels WHOM WE SECRETLY ARM... A victory for Bashar is a victory for Iran. And Iranian victories cannot be tolerated by the West."

Fisk concluded:

"We will be attacking Shia Muslims and their allies to the hand-clapping of Sunni Muslims. And that’s what civil war is made of.”

He also told us this:

"When Israel killed up to 17,000 men, women and children in Lebanon in 1982... America merely called for both sides to exercise ‘restraint’."

And posed this question:

“What happened to those magnificent Palestinian-Israeli negotiations that John Kerry was boasting about?"

Which he answered, himself, thus:

"While we express our anguish at the hideous gassings in Syria, the land of Palestine continues to be gobbled up. Israel’s Likudist policy, to negotiate for peace until there is no Palestine left, continues apace.”

The powers-that-be don't like Robert Fisk. Unfortunately for them he's not one of those common-or-garden hacks that you can do with impunity whenever they stray too far into the actuality zone.

You see, he has been voted International Journalist of the Year seven times and possesses more British and International Journalism awards than any other foreign correspondent. It'd be like polishing off the Pope. Some things just aren't done in polite society.

John Paul 1?

Oh, yeah. I was forgetting.
Posted by Michael Graham at 23:09 No comments:

Iran not Syria is the West's real target
On 30 August 2013, Robert Fisk opined thus in The Independent:

“Iran, not Syria, is the West's real target... Iran is Israel’s enemy. Iran is therefore, naturally, America’s enemy…

When Iraq, then America’s ally, used gas against the Kurds of Hallabjah in 1988, we did not assault Baghdad... I also happen to remember that the CIA put it about in 1988 that Iran was responsible for the Hallabjah gassings, a palpable lie that focused on America’s enemy whom Saddam was then fighting on our behalf…

Didn’t Iraq, when it was 'our' ally against Iran, also use gas on the Iranian army? It did. I saw the Ypres-like wounded of this foul attack by Saddam, US officers, I should add, toured the battlefield later and reported back to Washington, and we didn’t care a tinker’s curse about it. Thousands of Iranian soldiers in the 1980-88 war were poisoned to death by this vile weapon…

I think that Bashar al-Assad’s ruthless army might just be winning against the rebels WHOM WE SECRETLY ARM... A victory for Bashar is a victory for Iran. And Iranian victories cannot be tolerated by the West."

Fisk concluded:

"We will be attacking Shia Muslims and their allies to the hand-clapping of Sunni Muslims. And that’s what civil war is made of.”

He also told us this:

"When Israel killed up to 17,000 men, women and children in Lebanon in 1982... America merely called for both sides to exercise ‘restraint’."

And posed this question:

“What happened to those magnificent Palestinian-Israeli negotiations that John Kerry was boasting about?"

Which he answered, himself, thus:

"While we express our anguish at the hideous gassings in Syria, the land of Palestine continues to be gobbled up. Israel’s Likudist policy, to negotiate for peace until there is no Palestine left, continues apace.”

The powers-that-be don't like Robert Fisk. Unfortunately for them he's not one of those common-or-garden hacks that you can do with impunity whenever they stray too far into the actuality zone.

You see, he has been voted International Journalist of the Year seven times and possesses more British and International Journalism awards than any other foreign correspondent. It'd be like polishing off the Pope. Some things just aren't done in polite society.

John Paul 1?

Oh, yeah. I was forgetting.
Posted by Michael Graham at 23:09 No comments:

The instruments of subversion

On 7 October 2013, the leading Conservative journalist, Gerald Warner, informed us thus in The Scotsman:
"The War of Comrade Miliband generated much sound and fury, but all the belligerents and observers ignored its most salient aspect, that this imagined inquest on a supposedly dead creed was being conducted in the context of a society now dominated by Marxism.
The Party Line is currently termed Political Correctness, but the outcome is the same: the reconfiguration of language to police thought and impose an ideology, the harassing of religion, the destruction of marriage and the family, and the coercive remodelling of culture to accommodate a fanatical aberration that defies human nature itself.
Political correctness is cultural Marxism. The term was coined by Anton Semyonovich Makarenko, Lenin’s education guru and favourite wordsmith (he also invented the phrase 'dictatorship of the proletariat'). From the beginning, Marxists recognised there was a lot more involved in imposing totalitarian social control than nationalisation of the means of production, distribution and exchange.
In Hungary in 1919, during the short-lived but murderous Communist dictatorship of Bela Kun, his deputy 'commissar for culture,' Georg Lukacs, introduced a programme of 'cultural terrorism' under which he imposed pornographic sex education on schoolchildren, promoting promiscuity, denouncing the family and encouraging pupils to mock their parents and religion. The question Lukacs posed was: 'Who will save us from Western Civilisation?'
Four years later, Lukacs was one of the founders of the Institute for Social Research in Frankfurt, from which emerged the obscenity known today as Frankfurt School Marxism, dedicated to the destruction of civilisation. Max Horkheimer, its sometime director, followed up Lukacs’ experiment by grafting Freudianism onto Marxism. In this he was followed by Herbert Marcuse, an admirer of the Marquis de Sade, who expressed his belief in 'polymorphous perversity.'
This was complemented by the cultural Marxism of Gramsci and other adherents such as Adorno. Whether or not the Frankfurt Marxists had become sceptical of the command economy as an economic instrument, their main target was 'the culture.' Hitler’s accession to power drove the Frankfurt School prophets to seek refuge in America, for whose current state of debilitation they are ultimately responsible.
Their pretentious vapourings found favour in academic circles. Idiocies such as 'deconstruction,' whereby the texts of great writers were shredded by literary pygmies and reinterpreted in the light of Marxist neuroses, and 'critical theory' set about debauching the classical literary canon and vandalising knowledge.
Under this impetus, academic campuses, for half a century, have remained the unreformed temples of anti-culture; university library shelves still groan beneath the weight of delusory Marxist tomes. In the US, college campuses have become, in the words of Robert Lind, 'small ivy-covered North Koreas.'
By corrupting the educators, Frankfurt Marxism secured its ascendancy over the elites. Education, the media, publishing, politics – all the commanding heights have been occupied by the cultural Marxist forces of anti-civilisation. The targets are vestigial Christianity, traditional ­institutions, national identity, the family, seen as an intolerable rival to the ­intruder state, and relations between men and women.
The instruments of subversion are mass immigration and multiculturalism, to abolish homogeneity and national identity; the imposition of politically correct language (foreseen by Orwell as 'Newspeak') to prevent the articulation of dissident ideas; hate laws (also predicted by Orwell as 'thought crime'); feminism, designed to alienate women from traditional motherhood and family roles; and promotion of the homosexual agenda (because anti-family). The introduction of 'aggravated' offences has ended equality under the law...
The agenda has become blatantly coercive. Bans and prohibitions proliferate exponentially. Hideous neologisms such as 'homo­phobia' or 'Islamophobia' are intruded into public discussion to distort debate; last week the ludicrous Bonnie Greer promoted a new absurdity: 'gynophobia.'
Their common adherence to cultural Marxism has made all three political parties complicit in a de facto one-party state: a Conservative prime minister has a minister for equalities. Tory politicians are routinely described as 'socially liberal... Saul Alinsky, the Marxist activist, was the inspiration for David Cameron’s 'Big Society.'
The PC Terror threatens the employment and career prospects, on occasion the liberty, of those who do not ­conform. Public opinion is brainwashed by such devices as the 'availability cascade,' ­collective belief moulded via the availability in the public forum of PC views; the 'reputational cascade,' threatening social disapproval of dissidents; or the 'chilling effect' on contrary viewpoints...
In the tradition of Lukacs and Marcuse, society is offered a Faustian bargain: release from personal responsibility and legitimisation of hedonism if the public will embrace libertinism in exchange for liberty. Unless this totalitarian menace is quickly overthrown, Britain will confront a Marxist lunar landscape beyond the grimmest nightmares conceived by Ralph Miliband."
Of those mentioned in the above essay Ralph Miliband, Herbert Marcuse, Georg Lukacs, Saul Alinsky, Theodor Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Sigmund Freud, Bela Kun and Karl Marx were all Jewish.

Lenin's grandfather was Jewish. David Cameron's great-great grandfather was a Jewish immigrant.


In a 1972 interview with Playboy just before his death, Saul Alinsky said this:
"If there is an afterlife, and I have anything to say about it, I will unreservedly choose to go to hell... Hell would be heaven for me... If you're a have-not in hell, you're short of virtue."
From Alinsky's 'Rules for Radicals:'
“Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.”
“Keep the pressure on. Never let up.”
“The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”
“If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.”
“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize it.”
Sound familiar?

Thank you for daring to say what you say here as straightforwardly as you have, Mr. Warner.

The truths the patriot has been trying to get his own folk to take note of for more than eighty years are now well and truly mainstream.

The age of the psychopath is almost done.
Posted by Michael Graham at 00:34 No comments:

The man who hated Britain

In the 1 October Daily Mail article, 'The man who hated Britain: Red Ed's pledge to bring back socialism is a homage to his Marxist father,' Geoffrey Levy told us this:
"Solemnly, he stood at the grave of Karl Marx at a moment when, in his own words, 'the cemetery was utterly deserted . . . I remember standing in front of the grave, fist clenched, and swearing my own private oath that I would be faithful to the workers' cause'.

The year was 1940. The young man was Ralph Miliband, a Jewish immigrant who, with his father, had fled to London from Belgium just weeks earlier...

In his explosive memoirs... Gordon Brown's spin doctor Damian McBride argued that Ed Miliband was obsessed with maintaining his father's legacy. Winning the leadership was Ed's 'ultimate tribute' to his father, an attempt to 'achieve his father's vision...

As for the country that gave him and his family protection, the 17-year-old wrote in his diary: 'The Englishman is a rabid nationalist. They are perhaps the most nationalist people in the world . . . you sometimes want them almost to lose (the war) to show them how things are'...

This adolescent distaste for the British character certainly didn't stop him availing himself of the fine education that was on offer in this country, or spending the rest of his life here.

He got a place at the London School of Economics... and there he was taught politics by Harold Laski, a giant of Labour's Left, whom some Tories considered to be a dangerous Marxist revolutionary. Laski was Miliband's mentor, his inspiration, the figure who encouraged his growing interest in Karl Marx."
Miliband's tombstone lies just 12 yards from Karl Marx's grave in Highgate cemetery.


Following the furore that greeted the above article, on 2 August 2013, the historian, Michael Burleigh, said this in The Daily Mail:
“The camps were the Soviet gulags at their worst, where temperatures dropped below minus 50f — colder than at the North Pole. The Kolyma region had been chosen because of its gold mines, and the Communist leaders forced skeletal and ill-clad prisoners to produce 80,000 kg of refined gold. This was the mainstay of Stalin’s economy. Almost every kilogram cost a human life...

These horrific camps, there were more than 2,000 in total, had a joint economic and punitive purpose, whose prevailing philosophy was: ‘We have to squeeze everything out of a prisoner in the first three months; after that, we don’t need him any more’…

The U.S. historian Anne Applebaum estimates that a minimum of 2,750,000 people died in the gulag system. The camps were but one aspect of a tyrannical socialist system that, from the beginning of the Russian Revolution in 1917, under Lenin, relied on extreme violence to purge Soviet society of its ‘class’ enemies.

About 14 million people were killed in the civil war that followed the revolution, five million of them in a famine triggered by the insane economic policies of the Bolshevik government. A deliberate famine, designed to force peasants into collective farms, resulted in a further seven million deaths between 1928 and 1932…

Such a system… relied on any number of Western apologists to deny what others had witnessed first-hand. Many of these were British academics, intellectuals and journalists…

When Stalin decided to purge entire swathes of the Communist party in the mid-1930s, resulting in 600,000 or so people being tortured and shot, Western apologists lined up to excuse actions that had been motivated by his envy, paranoia, hatred and spite. The fact that the vengeance extended to the families and children of the Soviet butcher’s victims, and blighted the lives of others down the generations, was no hindrance to putting a rosy gloss on mass murder.

For Stalin established a few model prisons especially to show visiting Western dupes such as Professor Harold Laski, the mentor of Ralph Miliband at the LSE and chairman of the Labour Party. Laski, who was seemingly not shocked by prisoners having their teeth smashed out with iron bars, reported back: ‘Basically, I did not observe much of a difference between the general character of a trial in Russia and in this country.’

This pattern of exculpation of extreme brutality, provided it was meted out in the name of social justice, extended to justifying the infamous Nazi-Soviet Pact in 1939, which led to their joint invasion of Poland, the occupation of the Baltic states by Russia, and the Soviet invasion of Finland.

Among Western socialist sympathisers of the Soviets was Ralph Miliband’s friend, the Marxist historian Eric Hobsbawm, who claimed the real enemy was capitalism, not the two criminals in Berlin and Moscow… There was no shortage of such apologists. These were the kind of people whom Lenin had earlier called ‘useful idiots’…

These Western intellectuals of the Left… more often than not worshipped Stalin, demonstrating a shocking naivety, or, worse, a frightening amoralism worthy of Stalin himself. Indeed, Hobsbawm remained a Communist Party member despite Soviet tanks rolling into Hungary in 1956.

He was still lecturing his Marxist creed to students and writing books at a time when Soviet tanks rolled into Czechoslovakia in 1968, and during the period when thousands of dissidents were imprisoned or shot dead by execution squads…

During these years, the people who lived under Communist regimes struggled to find food, while elite party members had exclusive use of luxury stores. Uniformed Soviet personnel went to the front of any queue, as I witnessed myself in East German banks in the late-1970s. Everywhere, too, freedom of the Press had been eliminated in favour of state newspapers, radio and TV that sung the praises of the Communist leadership and ‘heroic’ tractor drivers.

Religion was aggressively wiped out, with priests and nuns murdered, to make way for the new socialist creed. Citizens were so afraid of what the secret police might overhear them saying that they could not trust even close friends in their own apartments.

Meanwhile, among the increasingly calcified minds in genteel Hampstead drawing rooms, tragedies affecting the lives of millions were no more than mere debating points, where they could expend their mock outrage, even as some of them climbed the Ruritanian heights of the British Establishment.

Feted by the bien pensant Left everywhere, men such as Laski, Hobsbawm and Miliband Snr specialised in talking in abstractions about real people, while men in the Siberian camps were forced to undertake heavy labour at gunpoint and try to avoid starving to death…

Hobsbawm remained an utterly unapologetic supporter of Stalinism until the day he died. He maintained that despite the millions of murders to which it led, the Russian Revolution of 1917 was a great cause to which he was right to remain loyal. In 1994, when asked whether ‘the radiant tomorrow’ had actually been created in the Soviet Union, the deaths of 15 or 20 million people would have been justified, Hobsbawm replied: ‘Yes.’
This was the same man who is still feted in New Labour circles. Indeed, he was made a Companion of Honour in Tony Blair’s first New Year’s Honours List in 1998.
And when he died last year, Ed Miliband released a statement mourning Hobsbawm as ‘a man passionate about his politics and a great friend of my family’.

While Ed Miliband feels aggrieved about the Mail’s profile of his father, he should surely realise that many people in Britain do not regard what happened to millions of people under Communism as a Hampstead parlour game."

Geoffrey Levy, who is Jewish himself, was good enough to inform us of the Jewish origins of Ralph Miliband, the man whom he suggests 'hated Britain.' Michael Burleigh did not. Nor did he mention that Harold Laski and Eric Hobsbawm were also Jewish.

A.B. Khalatov, Soviet Minister of Food at the time 'five million' died 'in a famine triggered by the insane economic policies of the Bolshevik government,' was also Jewish. As was Lazar Kaganovich, the man, along with Stalin, who was most responsible for the 'DELIBERATE famine' which 'resulted in a further seven million deaths.'

Karl Marx, of course, was also Jewish.
Posted by Michael Graham at 11:02 No comments:
Email This
BlogThis!
Share to Twitter
Share to Facebook

We were governed by people who were mentally ill!

On 28 September 2013, Rod Liddle said this in The Spectator:
“There is a little vignette in the first volume of Alastair Campbell’s diaries that makes it abundantly clear that, at the time, we were being governed by people who were mentally ill. It is yet another furious, bitter, gut-churning row involving Campbell, Tony Blair and Peter Mandelson and concludes with Mandelson stamping his little feet and screaming: ‘I am sick of being rubbished and undermined! I hate it! And I want out.’
The cause of this dispute was not whether or not Labour should nationalise the top 200 companies and secure for the workers by hand or by brain the full fruits of their industry. Don’t be silly. It was about whether Blair should wear a suit and tie to deliver a speech or if, instead, he should put on a nice pair of cords…

It is impossible to read this sort of thing without coming to the conclusion that the most senior elements of New Labour were mad as hatters... seriously damaged, deeply troubled people. If you read on through those diaries, this view is amply confirmed: these awful, awful people who are perpetually wracked with a paranoid fury, drunk or constipated or hunched over the toilet bowl with their fingers down their throats or visited by the Black Dog of depression, or ulcerated or prostate on some sofa to banish the clamorous headaches. And of course continually lying to one another when they weren’t lying to the rest of us, continually stitching each other up, dissolving in a vat of their own bile.

There have been plenty of diaries emanating from the rule of New Labour (and its hilariously incompetent vestigial tail presided over by the maddest of them all, Gordon Brown) by various unelected and now dispossessed political munchkins, most of them expressing a commercially expedient contrition along with the grotesque outrages, the infractions of democracy, the utter contempt not just for the electorate but also for most of their elected MPs.

The latest comes from a saturnine pudding-faced thug called Damian McBride… This oaf’s revelations are being serialised in a morning newspaper, all the usual toxic leaks designed to destroy his comrades’ careers, and the usual emetic hands-up-guv-I-shuddna-dunnit faux apology. McBride, who was finally kicked out of his job for inventing filth about various high-profile Conservative politicians is not really apologetic, of course. Far from it; he simply wishes to sell his book…
McBride is no more sorry than is Alastair Campbell; like Alastair, he just wishes to trouser as much dosh as is humanly possible from his tawdry revelations. I suppose the political correspondents will tell you that the source of that paranoid fury on both sides, Blair and Brown, was the deal or no deal which took place between the two at the Granita restaurant…
My guess is that long before that dinner each was, as the Americans put it, crazier that a shithouse rat. A megalomaniac on one side, a paranoiac devoid of even the most primitive vestiges of human sociability on the other… And on both sides the loathing, of their own colleagues, of the press, of the electorate.”
Posted by Michael Graham at 08:58 No comments:

The man of the future will be mixed-race!

Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894 –1972), whose father was an Austro-Hungarian diplomat and mother the daughter of a Japanese oil tycoon, was the founder, and President for 49 years, of the Pan-European Union.

In his 1925 book, ‘Praktischer Idealismus,’ he says this:
"The man of the future will be mixed-racel. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear... The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future... will replace the diversity of peoples...
Now we stand at the threshold of the third epoch of the new times: Socialism. Russian Bolshevism constitutes a decisive step towards this purpose where a small group of Communist spiritual aristocrats govern the country and consciously break with the plutocratic democratism which nowadays controls the rest of the world. The general staff of both parties is recruited from Europe's spiritual leader race, the Jews.
From the European quantity-people… the mass, two quality races rise up: blood aristocracy and Jewry… both of them stick to their belief in their higher mission, of their better blood… In both of these heterogenic merited races lies the core of the European nobility of the future… The superiority of their spirit predestines them to become a main factor of the future nobility…
Jewry has bestowed a greater gift on to the disinherited masses of Europe than any other people… Modern Jewry also surpasses all other peoples in percentage of important men… with Trotsky as the frontrunner of modern politics…The prominent position held by Jewry these days is owed to its spiritual supremacy....
Modern anti-Semitism is one of the many reactionary phenomenons of the mediocre against the supreme… As a people Jewry experiences the eternal struggle of quantity against quality, inferior groups against high quality individuals, inferior majorities against superior minorities...
A pacified and socialized Occident will no longer need masters and rulers, only leaders... Europe has been conquered religiously by Jews.”
At war with Japan in WW2, at war with Austria-Hungary in WW1, done over by the Norman aristocracy and their Jewish tax-farmers since 1066, and, in 1925, a Japanese/Austro-Hungarian, mixed-race aristocrat (two of whose three wives were Jewish) wanted to breed we white folks out of existence and install Communism and the Jew as our overlords? Ladies and gentlemen, if this isn’t genocidal New World Order treachery at its most hair-raisingly in your face, I don’t know what is.


Despite which, on 19 September 1946, no lesser personage than Winston Churchill was moved to say this:
"We must build a kind of United States of Europe… Much work has been done upon this task by the exertions of the Pan-European Union WHICH OWES SO MUCH TO COUNT COUDENHOVE-KALERGI…
The structure of the United States of Europe, if well and truly built, will be such as to make the material strength of a single state less important. Small nations will count as much as large ones…
If we are to form the United States of Europe… we must begin now… Our constant aim must be to build and fortify the strength of the United Nations Organisation… We must re-create the European family in a regional structure called… the United States of Europe.
The first step is to form a Council of Europe… France and Germany must take the lead together. Great Britain, the British Commonwealth of Nations, mighty America, and I trust Soviet Russia… must be the friends and sponsors of the new Europe.”
In his memoirs, Coudenhove-Kalergi says:

"At the beginning of 1924, we received a call from Baron Louis de Rothschild; one of his friends, Max Warburg from Hamburg, had read my book (‘Pan-Europa’) and wanted to get to know us. To my great surprise, Warburg spontaneously offered us 60,000 gold marks, to tide the movement over for its first three years ....
Max Warburg… had a principle of financing these movements. He remained sincerely interested in Pan-Europe for his entire life. Max Warburg arranged his 1925 trip to the United States to introduce me to Paul Warburg and financier Bernard Baruch." ('Black Terror, White Soldiers: Islam, Fascism and the New Age,' by David Livingstone)

Wikipedia says this of Bernard Baruch:
"He bought a seat on the New York Stock Exchange for $18,000 ($434,000 in today's dollars). There he amassed a fortune before the age of 30... By 1903 Baruch had his own brokerage firm.... By 1910, he had become one of Wall Street's best-known financiers...
In 1916, Baruch left Wall Street to advise President Woodrow Wilson on national defense and terms of peace. He served on the Advisory Commission to the Council of National Defense and, in 1918, became the chairman of the new War Industries Board. With his leadership, this body successfully managed the US's economic mobilization during WWI.
In 1919, Wilson asked Baruch to serve as a staff member at the Paris Peace Conference... In the 1920s and 30s, Baruch expressed his concern that the United States needed to be prepared for the possibility of another world war... Baruch remained a prominent government adviser during this time and supported Franklin D. Roosevelt's domestic and foreign policy initiatives after his election.
During President Roosevelt's 'New Deal' program, Baruch was a member of the 'Brain Trust' and helped form the National Recovery Administration...
When the United States entered WWII, President Roosevelt appointed Baruch a special adviser to the director of the Office of War Mobilization... During World War II Baruch remained a trusted adviser and confidant of President Roosevelt...
In February 1943, Roosevelt invited Baruch to replace the widely criticized War Production Board head Donald M. Nelson. Baruch had long coveted the job...
In 1946 President Harry S. Truman appointed Baruch as the United States representative to the United Nations Atomic Energy Commission."
Max Warburg (1867 - 1946) was director of the M. M. Warburg & Co. banking house in Hamburg from 1910 until 1938, when he left Germany for America. As head of that firm, he had been an adviser to Kaiser Wilhelm II prior to and during World War I.


In 1914, the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee was established to help Jews who found themselves in straightened circumstances as a result of the war. Max Warburg's brother, Felix, was a leading member of this organisation. In the 12 November 1919 edition of the New York Times, he said this:
"The successive blows of contending armies have all but broken the back of European Jewry and have reduced to tragically unbelievable poverty, starvation and disease about 6,000,000 souls... The Jewish people throughout Eastern Europe… have suffered more from the war than any other element of the population.”
Of course they have, Felix. All those broken-backed six million sufferers had a much, much harder time of it than all the dead lads who actually died in that useless catastrophe. Your six million must definitely have had to endure way more grief and anguish that all the mothers, wives, sweethearts and bewildered little working-class kids pining for their lost loved ones back home. You and your kinfolk are Jewish after all. And, as we all know, the Jew has managed to corner the market in suffering over the course of the last two thousand years.

Oh, and by the way, Felix, that ‘six million’ thing. What is it about that particular number that turns you on? I mean, here you are using it twenty six years before Auschwitz was liberated!

It’s all gone quiet over there.

A partner in the New York investment firm of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., Felix Warburg married the daughter of Jacob Schiff, a senior partner in the firm, in 1895. (Schiff was the principal monetary sponsor of the Russian Revolution)

Paul Warburg, another scion of the German-Jewish banking dynasty, was also a partner in Kuhn, Loeb and co. He arrived in the USA in 1902, having married, Nina, the daughter of Solomon Loeb, in the same year Felix married Frieda (Solomon's granddaughter).

This Warburg was the man most responsible for the creation, in 1913, of the Federal Reserve banking system. After he accepted a position on the board, the May 1915 issue of The Century Magazine quoted him thus:
“The opportunity was offered to show that a Wall Street man could become a valuable public servant and to disprove the prejudice that is rampant in this country that ‘a Wall Street man is a Wall Street man always’ and that you have to be afraid of him… One of the things that tempts me is to show that a Wall Street man does deserve the country's confidence.”
In ‘Warburg, the Revolutionist,' Harold Kellock told us this in the same issue of Century Magazine:
"Paul M. Warburg is probably the mildest-mannered man that ever personally conducted a revolution… He stepped forth armed simply with an idea and he conquered… He imposed his idea on a nation of a hundred million people…
Warburg does not look like an agitator or a revolutionist but he’s played that role for nearly seven years… Single-handed, he set out to bring about a radical constructive change. To accomplish this he had to educate business men and publicists and legislators to his ideas, to transform entirely the point of view of Congress toward financial legislation…
The passage of the Federal Reserve Act… made his revolutionary ideas the law of the land. There is no doubt that without Mr. Warburg there would have been no Federal Reserve Act…
He was a recent immigrant, a Hebrew, a Wall Street man…
It was intimated that Mr. Warburg was the nominee of the ‘money trust,’ that he represented ‘the interests’; there were hints of a Wall Street conspiracy to control the Treasury and the currency system.”
At one point in his essay, Kellock, said:
“Mr. Warburg's income from his private business was at this time (1913) approximately half a million dollars a year.”
$500,000 then would be worth $11,811,969.70 now.


On 17 February 1950, addressing the US Senate, Franklin D. Roosevelt’s top financial adviser, James Warburg, said this:
"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent."
James Warburg was Paul Warburg’s son.


On 10 June 1932, Congressman, Louis T. McFadden said this in the House of Representatives:
“We have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks… The depredations and iniquities of the Federal Reserve Board has cost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over.
This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through… the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it.
Some people think the Federal Reserve banks are United States Government institutions. They are not Government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; and rich and predatory money lenders.
In that dark crew of financial pirates there are those who would cut a man's throat to get a dollar out of his pocket; there are those who send money into States to buy votes to control our legislation; and there are those who maintain international propaganda for the purpose of deceiving us and of wheedling us into the granting of new concessions which will permit them to cover up their past misdeeds and set again in motion their gigantic train of crime.
These twelve private credit monopolies were deceitfully and disloyally foisted upon this country by the bankers who came here from Europe and repaid us for our hospitality by undermining our American institutions. Those bankers took money out of this country to finance Japan in a war against Russia. They created a reign of terror in Russia with our money in order to help that war along. They instigated the separate peace between Germany and Russia and thus drove a wedge between the Allies in the World War.
They financed Trotsky's passage from New York to Russia so that he might assist in the destruction of the Russian Empire. They fomented and instigated the Russian revolution and they placed a large fund of American dollars at Trotsky's disposal… so that through him Russian homes might be thoroughly broken up and Russian children flung far and wide from their natural protectors. They have since begun the breaking up of American homes and the dispersal of American children…
When the Federal Reserve act was passed, the people of the United States did not perceive that a world system was being set up here… to supply financial power to an international superstate , a superstate controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure…
The sack of the United States by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve banks is the greatest crime in history.”
On 27 June 1934, McFadden said this in Washington:
“An increasing number of Jews occupy high key positions in all departments of the United States government… Russian propaganda is freely circulating in the United States… Students of radicalism know that the present Soviet government in Russia was organized by aliens and usurpers and not representatives of the thoughts and ideals of the 150,000,000 citizens of Russia… Note the preponderance of Jews in the Russian government.
The recent overthrow of the German government by the Hitler movement was caused by the preponderance of Jews in the German government, in the universities, as lawyers, as physicians, as bankers… in commerce, in the theatre, moving picture industry, in politics. And now, in the United States government… an increasing number of Jews occupy high key position all departments…
Remember the boring-from-within tactics pursued by these aliens ursurpers who pursued tactics in Soviet Russia which caused the downfall of their government and set up the present Communist-Jewish control government which is now in operation…
The same kind of aliens and usurpers are now at work in the United States to establish a form of government other than the constitutional government.”
The subject of several assassination attempts, McFadden died suddenly of ‘intestinal flu’ after attending a banquet in 1936.


In a 1 October 2000 interview with PBS, Nobel Prize winner, Milton Friedman, whose monetarist philosophy had such a profound influence on Margaret Thatcher, said this:
“Under the Federal Reserve System, you had the worst banking crisis in the history of the United States… It followed policies which led to a decline in the quantity of money by a third. For every $100 in paper money, in deposits, in cash, in currency, in existence in 1929, by the time you got to 1933 there was only about $65, $66 left. And that extraordinary collapse in the banking system, with about a third of the banks failing from beginning to end, with millions of people having their savings essentially washed out, that decline was utterly unnecessary.
At all times, the Federal Reserve had the power and the knowledge to have stopped that… It was, in my opinion, clearly a mistake of policy that led to the Great Depression.”

At an 8 November 2002 conference to honour Friedman, Ben Bernanke, a Federal Reserve governor, said this:
“Before the creation of the Federal Reserve… bank panics were typically handled by banks themselves… However… in the early 1930s the Federal Reserve did not serve that function… Fed officials appeared to subscribe to Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon’s infamous ‘liquidationist’ thesis, that weeding out ‘weak’ banks was a harsh but necessary prerequisite to the recovery of the banking system. Moreover, most of the failing banks were small banks and not members of the Federal Reserve System. Thus the Fed saw no particular need to try to stem the panics.
At the same time, the large banks, which would have intervened before the founding of the Fed, felt that protecting their smaller brethren was no longer their responsibility. Indeed, since the large banks felt confident that the Fed would protect them if necessary, the weeding out of small competitors was a positive good, from their point of view.
Because of institutional changes and misguided doctrines, the banking panics of the Great Contraction were much more severe and widespread than would have normally occurred during a downturn… I would like to say to Milton and Anna: Regarding the Great Depression. You’re right, we did it. We’re very sorry. But thanks to you, we won’t do it again.”
They did it again in 2008. At that time, Bernanke was top man at the Fed.

Friedman was and Bernanke still is Jewish, as is Alan Greenspan, who was the Chairman of the Fed for 19 years in the run up to the 2008 crash.

Greenspan was knighted at the behest of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown in 2002.


On 19 November 2012, the European Council website told us this:
“The President of the European Council Herman Van Rompuy was awarded the Coudenhove-Kalergi Prize... to celebrate 90 years of the Pan-Europa movement. The prize is awarded biennially to leading personalities for their extraordinary commitment in the European unification process… The idea, which was also at the centre of Coudenhove-Kalergi's work, has lost nothing of its importance 90 years later…
The prize bears the name of Count Richard Nicolaus von Coudenhove-Kalergi... founder of the Pan-European movement (1923). Coudenhove-Kalergi was the pioneer of European integration and propagated the notion of a federation of European states in his works.
The Prize winners since 2000 have included the Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany Angela Merkel (2010) and Vaira Vike-Freiberga, the President of Latvia (2006).”
Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi’s melting pot endeavours and ideology were rewarded when, in 1950, he became the first recipient of the Charlemagne Prize.

Charlemagne was the first Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire.

Think about it.
Posted by Michael Graham at 03:53 1 comment:

In a 5 November 2013 Guardian article, the comedian Russell Brand described himself as ‘a right twerp… a junkie.’

Well, I don’t like junkies, I haven’t got time for twerps and I truly loathe the PC Crowd, of which awful bunch I’m sure Brand would claim membership. I’m also generally suspicious of left-wing, luvvie revolutionaries who happen to be multi-millionaires.

Nevertheless, on the rare occasions an obscenely over-compensated, politically correct, junkie twerp Red with a 'Messiah' complex tells it as it is, I’m happy to pass on the truths he tells to others.

Here is an edition of what he said in The Guardian:
“Politicians are frauds… The distinctions between the parties are insignificant. My friend went to a posh 'do' in the country where David Cameron… was in attendance. Also present were members of the opposition and former prime minister Tony Blair. Whatever party they claim to represent in the day, at night they show their true colours and all go to the same party… Our treasured concepts of tribe and nation are not valued by those who govern except when it is to divide us from each other. They don't believe in Britain or America they believe in the dollar and the pound.

Drone strikes on the innocent, a festering investment for future conflict. How many combatants are created each time an innocent person in a faraway land is silently ironed out from an Arizona call centre? The reality is we have more in common with the people we're bombing than the people we're bombing them for…

The US government gave a trillion dollars to bail out the big five banks over the past year. Banks that have grown by 30% since the crisis and are experiencing record profits and giving their execs record bonuses. How about… don't give them that money, use it to create one million jobs at fifty grand a year for people who teach, nurse or protect. These bailouts for elites over services for the many are institutionalised within the system, no party proposes changing it…

Philip Green, the bloke who owns Top Shop didn't pay any income tax on a £1.2bn dividend in 2005. None... The people who clean Top Shop paid more income tax than he did.

That's for two reasons, firstly because he said that all of his £1.2bn earnings belong to his missus, who was registered in Monaco and secondly because he's an arsehole.

The money he's nicked through legal loopholes would pay the annual salary for 20,000 NHS nurses…
If more young people are talking about fracking instead of twerking we're heading in the right direction. The people that govern us don't want an active population who are politically engaged, they want passive consumers distracted by the spectacle of which I accept I am a part."

Well said Russell. As regards the bits of your essay I left in anyway.

I wonder if he's aware of the fact that Sir Philip Green is Jewish? Shouldn't think so. I don't think your average left-wing luvvie is going to mess with with the blokes who own and control the majority of the Western World's media. He might find opportunities to augment his ever-increasing fortune disappearing quicker than it takes for a funny man to say: 'he's an arsehole!'

Mind you, Russell did have a pretty nasty crack at Andrew Sachs, (a much worthier Jewish icon than Green) didn't he? He got away with that so perhaps those who want our world destroyed think the generality of his degenerate contribution more valuable than the off-message particulars.

The trouble with junkie-twerp-luvvie-Reds is this: when they talk about serving 'the people', folks like me aren't included in that designation. If you're white, indigenous and not in favour of their PC agenda, you're a non-person. Someone who doesn't deserve to figure in the lovely, fluffy not quite all-inclusive Brandesque Utopia.

Indeed, you are probably someone whose views must be howled down. (As is the left-wing way) In favour of views like this:
"One day Britain will have a black Prime Minister! Good! Good... This is a multicultural society, be good to have a black Prime Minister!" (2002 documentary, 'Nazi Boy', in conversation with BNP's Mark Collett
Never mind. When God lies, we must condemn him as a liar. When the Devil tells the truth, we should applaud his honesty. In an age of spin and deceit, getting to grips with hard, unspun reality, when fraudulent 'politicians... all go to the same party,' is more important than the testamentary precision of our supernatural overlords.

And much more important than the fact that the reality-provider in question happens to be, to use Russell's own nomenclature, a 'w***ker.'
Posted by Michael Graham at 07:07 No comments: